Discovery in archives sheds new light on Jex-Blake’s campaign for medical education for women

Dr Sophia Jex-Blake, c. 1860.

It has been known that Sophia Jex-Blake and her supporters, in their quest to open up University medical education for women, had written to the Senatus Academicus at St Andrews in an attempt to gain admittance to classes there, but the documentary evidence was not apparently extant.

While searching the Senatus papers for information about the University’s higher certificate for women, I was astounded to come across what must be the very letter Jex-Blake wrote, so far unlisted. It was dated 17 July 1873 and signed by herself and 10 other ladies: Edith Pechey, A.R. Barker, Alice J.S. Ker, Elizabeth J. Walker, Agnes McLaren, Isa Foggo, Jane R. Robison, Elizabeth Vinson, Jane Massingberd-Mundy – all who are also known to have been prominent in the movement for female higher education and several in the female suffrage campaign.

Box D of St Andrews archive UYUY459: four bundles of documents relating to the Senatus Academicus, where the letter from Jex-Blake was found.

The letter takes the form of a petition with several submissions amongst which is the interesting argument that:

“The most general objection to the admission of women to Universities lies in the supposed difficulty of educating them jointly with male students of medicine.” This argument, she writes, may be applicable to “every university in the kingdom except that of St Andrews” where there are no male students of medicine.

the full letter (UYUY459/Box D/Bundle 1871-73) is available above

Apparently ‘at least fifteen ladies would at once avail themselves of the permission, if given, to matriculate at the University of St Andrews’. The women also offered to hire or build suitable premises for a medical school and to arrange for lectures to be delivered in the subjects not already covered in the curriculum at St Andrews.

Jex-Blake’s campaign had just suffered a setback in an attempt to graduate in the University of Edinburgh. However, although there was considerable sympathy amongst members of the Senatus at St Andrews, its response was to refer back to the case of Elizabeth Garrett (Anderson) whose attempt to be admitted in November 1862 had been rejected on the basis of a ruling by the Solicitor General for Scotland. The upshot was a second rejection for the women in the short term, but a longer term commitment by St Andrews to female higher education. The Senatus immediately proposed the establishment of a sub-committee to investigate the issue. An eventual outcome of this episode and the deliberations of the committee was the establishment of the Lady Literate in Arts, the university’s innovative programme for a specifically female degree level certificate which lasted from 1877 until the 1930s.

The Senatus Academicus Room, South Street, St Andrews c. 1890 by John Fairweather (from the St Andrews Photographic Collection, StAU-SR-1).

Most of the signatories of 1873 letter did eventually succeed in practising as doctors by qualifying outwith the United Kingdom and Jex-Blake herself went on to resolve her difficulties by setting up the Edinburgh School of Medicine for Women in 1886. Clearly, too, she did not bear a grudge because in 1893 she wrote to propose an affiliation between her School of Medicine and St Andrews. This document appears to be missing – perhaps further research will happily unearth this also.

-Lis Smith

Doctoral Candidate, Institute of Scottish Historical Research

4 responses to “Discovery in archives sheds new light on Jex-Blake’s campaign for medical education for women

  1. If only we could get all that lovely muniment stuff item-listed!!! Great post, Lis!

    • Thanks, Rachel. This find was very special for me but, while I’ve been trawling muniments for my own research, I’ve seen so much that can illuminate the history of the University. It would be so good to have more of it listed and evident for other researchers. Lis

  2. This is a wonderful find – and illustrative of the fact that there is so much in the ‘official’ records – that is, held in establishment repositories – yet to be unearthed. Too often there are gems such as this that have gone unnoticed. I have a similar experience in the Australian context: trawling Australian High Court cases for a case I was running, I came across the name ‘Pankhurst’ in the case listings. Yes, Adele Pankhurst (and two others – Alice Suter and Jennie Baines) in High Court appeals never referred to or analysed anywhere, particularly in women’s history/herstory. They are now!

  3. Pingback: A Woman is a Person! Sophia Jex-Blake’s Historical Struggle « Women's History Network Blog·

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s